Last week, we could have delved into the immense trust “Dragon’s Dogma 2” places in the hands of its players and the unparalleled freedom it returns. It’s genuinely your adventure. But no, the spotlight had to fall on microtransactions. The debate was off-base, ill-timed, misplaced, and targeted the wrong type of microtransactions. The truly malevolent ones aren’t found in “Dragon’s Dogma 2,” but rather in the algorithms that escalated the uproar to a fever pitch.
Granted, one might argue that any form of microtransaction has no place in a fully-priced game meant for solitary enjoyment. Despite finding the entire commotion exaggerated, it’s a stance I can’t argue against.
The gaming community erupted in anger and astonishment. Reddit threads, countless tweets, numerous YouTube videos, Twitch streams, and a Steam discussion page plastered with opinions left no escape from the microtransaction drama of “Dragon’s Dogma 2.” They had to be glaringly obvious. Doubt briefly crept in on me.
A week before the release, Capcom provided a review document listing items available for real money, their prices, and purchase limits. Without having booted up the game yet, nothing particularly alarming caught my eye. Fifty hours into the game, revisiting the list confirmed it wasn’t worth a mention in my review.
In retrospect, it was my oversight. Having firsthand information, I should’ve better illuminated the reality. Briefly: all items were also obtainable in-game, not affecting the economy or player experience.
I was unprepared for the onslaught of misinformation and erroneous conclusions that spread like wildfire. Rumors claimed fast travel was locked behind a paywall, character customization required real money, and superior, lighter camping gear could be bought for a few dollars. This led to a boycott against these practices. Capcom found itself under fire, and Dragon’s Dogma 2 faced a barrage of negative Steam reviews. A lesson, it seemed.
Yet, Capcom’s decision to make certain real-money items more accessible hints not at a community victory but at another defeat in the information war. Some may boast post-patch acceptability, claiming misguided activism as their victory, while the boundaries had always been reasonable.
The genuinely nefarious microtransactions remain unaddressed, and the cost is ours to bear, far exceeding the minor expense of in-game items like the Portcrystal for fast travel. The outrage over these details, often fueled by content creators jumping on the bandwagon without proper investigation, led to a toxic cycle of misinformation.
The surge of videos, streams, and tweets seemed to emerge from a content factory, all echoing the same misinformed sentiments. Even reputable journalists were caught in the wave of misinformation, leading to premature judgments about the game. This cycle of manufactured outrage, driven by clicks and views, benefits the creators at the expense of truth and genuine discourse.
I’d have preferred discussing the in-game economy of “Dragon’s Dogma.” The intricacies of trade, varying inn rates, the presence of swindlers, and the constant struggle to manage finances in a world teeming with enticing purchases highlight the game’s depth. Yet, the internet’s outrage over microtransactions drew the focus away from these elements.
“Dragon’s Dogma 2” encourages players to invest time and explore, with limited fast travel not sold for real money to preserve game balance. However, the nuances of its design and intentions are lost amidst the noise generated by those who’ve turned outrage into a business model. The true issue isn’t the microtransactions in “Dragon’s Dogma 2,” but rather the misplaced anger fueled by others’ declarations. It’s this misdirected fury that truly deserves our attention and critique.
Affiliate Link Disclosure: Links to shops are partner links, for qualified sales we receive a commission. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
